Curse

Antheus · Dec 22, 2006, 03:38 AM // 03:38

"I'm using Animate Thread Minions"

Stormcloud · Dec 22, 2006, 03:49 AM // 03:49

/not signed for hording reasons

Saryn · Feb 06, 2007, 05:18 AM // 05:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumbassturtle

/signed

I can see why they wouldn't but if they do I won't complain.

Maybe a new tab on storage that lets you hold one of each type of rune (i.e. one of each atribute type for each class wheter its minor, major or sup is your choice) or a Guild storage? I hold onto runes to outfit my guild its getting a little crazy. ;P

/Signed
Good idea, limiting the number of runes one can hold in storage would limit hoarders (grrr to those people

)

"Play the game, not the players."

Tarun · Feb 22, 2007, 06:21 PM // 18:21

I figured this would be most useful for those who farm runes for profit. A lot of times people salvage as they farm and if they can stack it would help save a lot of space.

Shady79 · Feb 22, 2007, 06:38 PM // 18:38

omg are you crazy at all????????

WORST IDEA EVER. Rune prices will EXPLODE. I don't want to pay more than 11k for necro runes.

/NOTSIGNED

Loviatar · Feb 22, 2007, 06:47 PM // 18:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tarun

I figured this would be most useful for those who farm runes for profit. A lot of times people salvage as they farm and if they can stack it would help save a lot of space.

and watch them hoard until the superior absorb is back to 100k and the sup vigor is 75k and the others are 5k-25k.

that is exactly why the farmers have zero chance on this one.

MithranArkanere · Feb 22, 2007, 08:23 PM // 20:23

This could be done only if the stack where something like 10, not the usual 250.

Drelias Melaku · Apr 27, 2007, 10:41 PM // 22:41

/SIGNED!!!!!

Why haven't they done this yet? ;_;

Exterminate all · Apr 28, 2007, 02:11 AM // 02:11

/Signed Yea.. pretty good idea, lessen up the cluster

DarkGanni · Oct 24, 2007, 12:08 PM // 12:08

Since the new thread for same idea was closed its time to resurrect this one with a nice /signed to it

- Ganni

Witchblade · Oct 24, 2007, 01:15 PM // 13:15

there is a way to stack runes already, it's called Rune Trader, check your outposts

greenreaper3 · Nov 06, 2007, 06:18 AM // 06:18

/signed i dont see why not

P.S.

i thought u meant the effects stack.. i mean imange a monk with 4 prot runes :P

Yawgmoth · Nov 06, 2007, 11:15 AM // 11:15

I rarely store ~any~ runes in inventory/storage, and having multiples of the same doesn't make sense. Rune Trader is really very useful, I never bother with selling runes to other players, it's just not worth the time. I even don't keep any runes I know I may use in near future, I sell immediately to trader and buy when needed. And who would use multiples of the same rune?

For my hoarding needs the addition of Heroes in Nightfall was more than enough - their armors don't break when salvaging so I had heroes with multiple Sup Vigors on them (and then losing a lot on them dropping from 30k to about 10)

I'd say this feature is not needed for runes and it may only help those who for some shady reason wants to hoard dozens and dozens pieces of the same rune.

One thing much more needed than this - all the Inscriptions to be stackable! There aren't any npc trader for them and some are well worth keeping in multiples, all those 15^50s and other useful ones are pretty common, and there are also those Measure for Measure ones, worth alot when put into certain items but one of them takes a precious inventory slot is just not worth it.

Hyper.nl · Nov 06, 2007, 12:08 PM // 12:08

/signed to make runes stack. It's the way it always should have been imo.

VinnyRidira · Nov 06, 2007, 02:05 PM // 14:05

/signed

For those who object because of price hoarding. Please can we have Black and White Dye not stack. lol

Xue Fang · Jan 29, 2008, 05:01 AM // 05:01

I realize the age of the age of this thread, but this 2.75 year old problem still needs consideration.

HawkofStorms · Jan 29, 2008, 05:20 AM // 05:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xue Fang

I realize the age of the age of this thread, but this 2.75 year old problem still needs consideration.

No it doesn't. The arguements against it are still valid. Doing this will allow for people to intentionally hoard runes and control market prices.

Xue Fang · Jan 29, 2008, 05:59 AM // 05:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by HawkofStorms

No it doesn't. The arguements against it are still valid. Doing this will allow for people to intentionally hoard runes and control market prices.

The arguments for it are still valid. We have limited storage space, and with insignias dropping like water in a rain storm, storage space is filled in less than a day to an addicted player.

p.s. People hoard Ectos and Armbraces, and the value has found a constant.

MithranArkanere · Jan 29, 2008, 09:30 AM // 09:30

The problem to stack runes is that they are upgrades.

And so, they can be identified and have their own Value attribute.
You can stack only things with fixed Values attributes (1gold for dyes, 100g for Ecto).

On top of that, unlike dyes and rare materials, runes are something that everyone need to be as effective as the rest of players.
So it's better is the less used cost just 100g and people can't hoard too much Superior Vigor runes to use them as currency.
They drop much less than ectos.

Biostem · Jan 29, 2008, 09:41 AM // 09:41

Here's what I would suggest: just like we have crafting material storage in our Xunlai chest, also add a page for armor & armor-related items, (runes, insignias, & armor itself). Keep the non-stacking aspect of runes, but giving that 1 extra page would add some rune storage if you want it, and also satisfy the need of people who want to store several suits of armor as well.